Gas prices are going down. That's not a particularly unique observation.
Many of us know that the gas prices in the United States have plummeted
recently. Here's a novel idea: these gas
prices have gone down because there is less demand.
With
the advent of more efficient and eco-friendly vehicles the demand for
gas has diminished. That paired with the fact that supply was increased
when more drilling occurred in the
United States caused the lower prices. I think that in the United States
demand decreased, supply increased, and the prices followed the laws of
economics and decreased. Here is the important thing to learn from this
phenomenon: we as consumers impacted that reality. The corporations
could not change the fact that when our habits of buying large
quantities of gas decreased, then the value of their product also
decreased. Look at how much power we have! I saw that the direction that
gas prices were going, and as soon as I had the opportunity to live in
town and walk to schools and grocery stores I took it. I saw how trends
were going, gas prices were going up, my income was certainly not
increasing, so in order to just keep surviving I planned that as a back
up plan I would just walk everywhere if I ever couldn't afford to drive.
I ended up not being able to afford the upkeep of my car for a while,
so I decided to walk or take public transportation while I saved money
for fixing my car. The result was that I learned it was possible. I
could live for months at a time without a car, and this saved me money
on gas as well. We can make a difference by buying cars that don't use
gas, if we can afford that option, or by walking and taking public
transportation if possible. This helps us to take our lives and our
future into our own hands. We can do it. Yes we can.
Here's a link to a guide to more eco-friendly cars: http://www.ecolivingexperts.com/eco-friendly-cars/
Trivett on Emerging Technologies
Monday, February 23, 2015
Thursday, August 7, 2014
Steven Pinker: The surprising decline in violence
Technology has made the world smaller, and it will eventually allow us
to (or has allowed us to) enjoy the benefits of cooperation in a way that is
more accessible to more people than ever. Here Steven Pinker talks about the surprising
decline in violence among humans, and urges us to focus on some of the
things we are doing right in society. I think this is really important.
Saturday, August 2, 2014
Why Technology is the Most Important Factor in the Success of Schools Today
So with the advent of so much technology, many parents fear that technology is stunting learning. Some researchers are finding the opposite to be true. Do
students really learn better when using technology and online tools?
The recent scientific research and theories on best learning practices
are evidence for several convincing arguments that students, in fact, do learn better with the aid of technology. Learning
supported with online technology is the answer to the problem of a homogenized educational curriculum that we saw as a result of people in education responding in a very uncreative way to the requirements for meeting state and federal standards. It is a widely recognized
fact that what was once our U.S. schools one-size-fits-all
approach to learning is now outdated. In order to bring schools into the
realm that most students are already existing in today, a realm that is
dominated by the use of online tools and technologies, we need to
acknowledge the power that online learning brings to the learning
process. Online learning and access to new technologies simply makes the
classroom more student centered (Clark, 2008). If we were to ask students
what they think about implementing technologies in the classroom in
order to maximize learning, according to the CDW 21st-Century Classroom
Report (2011), 94 % of students say that they believe that using
technology to hone and develop their skills will maximize their
opportunities for success in the future. The statistics for teachers that believe this to be true is less than half of that figure (CDW
Government LLC ). Technologies in the classroom
are compared to disruptive innovations in the marketplace by Professor
C. Christensen (2008). Disruptive innovations in the marketplace is a
term coined to explain important, complex innovations that provide
services or products that were once so expensive that they were only
available to a few elite customers available to almost everyone.
According to Christensen in his book “Disrupting Class” (2008),
technology is the disruptive innovation in the education sector that
will change the way that educators approach learning forever. With all
of this in mind embracing technology and online learning tools as the
best way to reach all students is the logical next step for visionary
educators.
Resources
CDW
Government LLC (2011). The 2011 CDW-G 21st-Century Classroom Report.
Vernon Hills, Il: CDW-G. Retrieved August 8, 2014 @
http://newsroom.cdw.com/features/feature-06-28-10.html
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting Class. New York: McGraw Hill.
Clark,
T. (2008). Online Learning: Pure Potential. Educational Leadership,
Reshaping High Schools,65(8). Retrieved July 31, 2014 @
http://www.blackboard.com/resources/k12/ASCD_Online_Learning_Pure_Potential.pdf
Monday, July 14, 2014
Friday, May 30, 2014
GutiƩrrez: We can have law and order and justice and compassion
This is a very, very good man who explains the problem and what we need to do to humanize our system. He speaks from his heart. God bless him. Watch this speech, please, and understand what he says: " We can have law and order and justice and compassion" (Congressman Gutierrez, 2014).
Thursday, May 15, 2014
The Outernet Just Might be the Answer!
Although
the Internet has made access to information potentially accessible to
more people, emerging technologies have also created a digital divide
between economic classes in our society (Laureate, 2009).
Emerging technologies have created a digital divide between economic
classes in our society (Laureate, 2009). This same sentiment is
expressed in the sentence, “The future has arrived; it just wasn't
distributed equally” (Gibson, W n.d.; Kennedy, 01, 12, 2012).
So
how can we, as educational leaders, help narrow that divide? Well,
the answer is that we need to help make technologies more accessible
to everyone while providing an income for those that work in the
technology industry. Dr. Elliot Soloway (2009) suggests that profits
are now going to be made by disruptors in the industry who understand
that the money to be made will be through providing services for the
consumer, no longer by providing purchasable items (such as bits of
software) (Laureate, 2009).
Metcalf's
Law is the law that the power of the network increases by the number
of people involved squared. As technology leaders, then, it stand to
reason, we want to keep as many people involved in the Internet as
possible. The value of our network is found in its global reach. One
way that access is becoming more available to more people is that
Smart phone sales are growing globally. Right now Smart phones are
the future of technology. The Smart phone provides opportunities for
the average person in ways that have the potential to narrow the
technology gap. (Laureate, 2009).
Another
way that the growing divide could continue to be widened if we, as
technology leaders, allow it to is that the Internet may no longer
remain neutral. What this means is, the FCC may cave to pressure to
allow for companies to pay for faster Internet services, making the
Internet less neutral. Right now almost anyone can access the
Internet for a small monthly fee, and no one is given priority for
faster service. If the FCC passes what the FCC calls, in a strange
Orwellian double-speak term, new “net neutrality” rules there is
a possibility that the rich corporations will have access to an
Internet fast-lane, while the rest of us normal folk will be left out
(Selyukh, 2014). This has the potential weaken the positive global
effect that our current Internet has had in making information more
equally accessible to all, in a way that is more more prevalent than
ever before.
The
disruptors, the technology leaders, the inventors, and the innovation
champions are already looking for ways to counteract any form of
censorship or special rights for certain groups that could occur
through FCC regulations and financial strong-holds on the Internet.
There is now an “Outernet” in the works that would allow for free
access to all of humanity through WiFi from space, despite attempts
to close down the openness we now enjoy on the Internet (Outernet,
n.d.. @ https://www.outernet.is/).
We can, and should -as technology leaders-, develop U.S. and global
policies to protect this, and we can encourage all citizens to
exercise their voice and speak up for their right to access to
information.
References
Laureate
Education, Inc. (2009). Emerging and future technology: Diversity
and globalism. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Outernet
(n.d.) @ https://www.outernet.is/
Kennedy,
P. (01/13/2012) William Gibson's future is Now. The New York Times. @
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/books/review/distrust-that-particular-flavor-by-william-gibson-book-review.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Selyukh,
A. (May 15, 2014). Amid protests, U.S. FCC proposes new 'net
neutrality' rules. Reuters, WA @
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/15/us-usa-internet-neutrality-idUSBREA4C0SF20140515
Wired.
(2014-05-02 18:45 UTC). Outernet: A space-based alternative Internet
designed to evade censorship. Interactivity will be limited (no
uploads). @ http://hiw.me/WIRED/status/462301794304282626
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Red Queens: DVDs and Video-on-demand technologies
One competitive force behind emerging
technologies is the the "Red Queen," based on Lewis Carol's character from Through the Looking Glass (Thornburg, 2008c). An emergent Red Queen
has an undeniable and obvious impact on the evolution of technology,
because of the fierce competition between technologies. The
consequence of a fierce battle between two Red Queen technologies;
each one racing to keep ahead of the other, results in the other
similar technologies becoming obsolete (Laureate, 2009).
When I needed to find a way to view the
movie based on a Philip K. Dick book, A Scanner Darkly, I was
able to find a vendor that offered this service to me for free, on
demand. This current competition between DVDs and video-on-demand is
an example of a Red Queen rivalry. When Video-on-demand became available to
the public, all of Blockbluster Video Outlets open as retail rental
outlets for DVD rental and purchase were put out of business, they
are all literally closed directly due to the availability of Video-on-demand technology. This shows that DVDs and Video-on-demand are
Red Queens, based on Thornburg's definition (2008c).
According to McLuhan’s tetrad
(2008b), Videos-on demand enhance current technologies because it
accelerates accessibility, improves price, and convenience to the
consumer. It obsoletes rental video stores available for rental as
physical retail outlets, retrieves the access to programming once
available from your living room when televisions were first invented,
and could be replaced in the future by a wild card technology not
currently in existence, thus reversing the
enhancing features that it originally introduced.
References
Laureate Education, Inc. (2009).
Emerging and future technology. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Thornburg, D. D. (2008b). Emerging
technologies and McLuhan's Laws of Media. Lake Barrington,
IL: Thornburg Center for Space Exploration.
Thornburg, D. (2008c). Red Queens,
butterflies, and strange attractors: Imperfect lenses into emergent
technologies. Lake Barrington, IL: Thornburg Center for Space
Exploration.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)